The Hart Breaking Downfall of a Hero

By Erich R Pilcher

A common saying is “You should never meet your heroes”. Ever since I heard that quote, I have always taken exception to it. My main argument was, why wouldn’t you want to meet your heroes?

I’ve met my three childhood heroes: Ric Flair (a huge disappointment), William Shatner (a delight), and Bret “The Hitman” Hart.

In some way, I found I could relate to Bret. He wasn’t the biggest or the strongest. But as a child growing up, I never doubted The Hitman could beat any challenger. When I met Hart, he was very gracious and cordial. When I departed, I told him thank you for never letting me down and being my hero. He said he was glad he never let me down and thanked me for letting him be my hero. Twelve-year-old me shrieked in joy as forty-one-year-old me walked out on cloud nine.

Myself and Bret “The Hitman” Hart, May 2024

Unfortunately, my hero has let me down, and it is as heartbreaking now as it would have been when I was a child.

At an event hosted by Johnny I Pro Show in Montreal, Hart spoke about one of pro wrestling’s most infamous events, the “Montreal Screw job”. This took place at World Wrestling Entertainment’s (WWE) annual November event, Survivor Series, in 1997. This event was the unscripted, real-life double cross of Hart, orchestrated by WWE Chairman Vincent McMahon and opponent/real-life rival Shawn Michaels to get the championship off of Hart in his last night with the company. Ever since that night, the mere mention of it elicits debates and discussions regarding every bit of it, even the legitimacy of whether it was scripted or not (the key participants have vehemently denied it being scripted to this day).

When speaking about this, Hart dropped a bombshell: “I think that Shawn and Vince were sleeping with each other. I’m just telling you, I think I’m very close to the truth here. Shawn and Vince were lovers. I’m being dead honest. When I look back, it’s like I got caught between two lovers, and I got shafted and screwed over, and Shawn was so envious and jealous of my position that he finally had to sleep with Vince to get it.” Hart said.

He concluded, “I would say it to Shawn if he were right here. I would actually like to have Shawn come clean and say, ‘Look, we were lovers.’ Because I’m sure they were.”

In an effort to present all sides, Michaels was difficult to work with then (he has since become a Born Again Christian and changed his life), and the controversy surrounding McMahon and his alleged illegal sexual acts is well known. But this is a reach for attention, using McMahon’s controversy to garner attention for himself and create scandalous headlines. A far cry from the heroic being Hart was during his career.

Ever since his in-ring career ended because of a severe concussion suffered in late 1999 (Due to a mule kick delivered by Bill Goldberg), Hart has had some very strong opinions regarding all aspects of the business, most of them negative. To be fair, Hart has suffered great loss and tragedy in the pro wrestling business. His brother Owen died performing a pre-match stunt for WWE at an event in May 1999. The aforementioned screw job and his career ending early, one could almost sympathize with Hart. Personally, I always defended Hart’s takes because deep down I viewed him as I did as a child, the morally upstanding hero that would never let me down.

That is, until now, and I cannot defend him any longer.

For context, Hart suffered a stroke in 2002, and it is widely believed the concussion that ended his career caused it. Strokes can cause many long-lasting mental issues, including mood swings and instability. In 2009, Hart returned to WWE on Monday Night Raw and buried the hatchet with Michaels. It appeared decades of personal and professional rivalry had been put to bed. That is, until these comments.

Many have dismissed Hart’s claims. Professional wrestling legends Kevin Nash, Jim Cornette, and Eric Bischoff (whom Hart has gone on numerous tirades against) have all said this is false, and Bischoff even suggested Hart seek professional help.

As a middle-aged adult, my heart breaks to see my hero become a shell of what once was. An upstanding man who would mostly fight for what was right. Now, he fights for clicks and adulating cheers from crowds. The cheers are done for the blistering burials Hart unleashes whenever he feels the need on whoever he feels deserves it. Not for what they should be for, tales of road stories and matches from the greatest ring technician ever.

As for me, I choose to remember Bret for what he meant to me as a child. His great matches and moments that are etched in time. When these episodes occur (and they will continue), I realize I will have to try harder to find that warm nostalgia of Hart. Regardless of what happens next, I will know that I met him when he was my hero and that he never let me down. That will have to be the lasting memory. Because if it were anything after that, it would be the HART breaking downfall of my hero.

The Eyes Have It

By Erich R Pilcher

An American Football season is unlike any other, no matter the level at which it is competed at. It doesn’t have the plodding nature of a baseball season, and it lacks the lulls that hockey and basketball provide. It is a nine-to-twenty-game sprint (depending on level of competition, location, etc.) to desired championship glory. It is what happens during that sprint that keeps us captivated, and in college football, it has opened a firestorm of controversy and hot takes.

The Notre Dame Fighting Irish are currently 9-2 and are ranked ninth in the College Football Playoff rankings. Since starting the season 0-2. They have won nine consecutive games and have dominated in doing so, beating all opponents by double digits. Their ranking would give them one of the coveted 12 spots in the playoffs if the season ended today. That is where the perceived issues begin.

One of the teams Notre Dame lost to (in week one), the Miami Hurricanes, are ranked 12th. They currently have identical 9-2 records. This has led many to cry for Justice, brand bias, and other ridiculous claims. What makes them ridiculous is that they are not based in fact or even on what the eyes see.

POINT 1: YES, HEAD TO HEAD MATTERS, BUT…

Since the aforementioned loss, calling Notre Dame dominant would be an understatement. They have won 9 consecutive games by close to thirty points per game. They have done so against two ranked opponents (USC and at Pittsburgh) and two Group of 5 teams (Navy and Boise State) that could play for their conference championship. Notre Dame’s only other loss occurred to Texas A&M two weeks after the Miami loss. That loss was by one point (due to a botched hold on an extra point try and an egregious missed holding call on the game-winning touchdown). Texas A&M is undefeated and ranked fourth.

Miami is a different story. They lost at home to unranked Louisville, then on the road to unranked Southern Methodist University (SMU). Since that win, Louisville is mired in a three-game losing streak. SMU has surged, but the Louisville loss still hurts the Hurricanes in a larger way because of what they have shown as of late.

I do think head-to-head matters, but it is not empirical. Basing a decision on one game, especially one from week one, does not tell the whole story. By basing it only on that result, you are saying a team cannot improve or get worse. Two things we know to be false.

POINT 2: JUST COMPARE THEM AGAINST EACH OTHER
This seems like a logical conclusion, and it is one made in large part by Miami supporters. However, it does not help Miami’s case; as a matter of fact, it hurts it even more. In the table below (Courtesy of Bryan Driskell of Irish Breakdown), you see a better comparison is Notre Dame versus Alabama (ranked tenth). In almost every comparison, Notre Dame is better than Miami. This includes key metrics Strength of Record (SOR), Strength of Schedule (SOS), and quality wins.

IMAGE COURTESY OF BRYAN DRISKELL OF IRISH BREAKDOWN

POINT 3: WHO NEEDS THE COMMITTEE, THEY JUST GET IT WRONG ANYWAY
Before the playoff began in the 2014 season, college football used the Bowl Championship Series (BCS). This would put various rankings into the computer and average teams out. Another common crying point by Miami is that the committee does not know football. In the table below, we see that Miami would not even be in the playoffs using the BCS formula, as they wouldn’t be in the top twelve. Also of note, Notre Dame is ranked in the top twelve in all of them except one (A&H) and holds an average ranking of seventh. This would not only put Notre Dame in the playoffs, but also give them a home playoff game

FINAL POINT: STOP SCHEDULING NOTRE DAME

This is just as ridiculous as the age-old diatribe “Notre Dame should join a conference”. The only reason Miami is even in consideration for a playoff spot is that they beat Notre Dame. Without that game, they would need countless miracles to get back into consideration. Miami is currently fifth in the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) standings. To even get to the conference championship game, they need to win at Pittsburgh and get a lot of help. If that win over Notre Dame was against a lesser team, they would not even be in the top 20.

As we approach the final regular-season weekend, the case for Miami is not comparing it to Notre Dame. It is what you see from them. When you watch Miami, do you see one of the 12 best teams in the country? I do not feel that is the case. They have been inconsistent, and in the games they have lost, they have given away the game through penalties and inexcusable turnovers. If Miami misses the playoffs, they have no one to blame but themselves. Not a committee and certainly not Notre Dame.